Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Max Alcala Gurri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent performance on second serves shows Wild with a slight edge, winning 44.82% of these points compared to Gurri's 42.35%. Can these percentages influence the match outcome significantly? Historically, yes.
• In return games, Gurri outperforms Wild, capturing 51.94% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Wild's 45.43%. On first serve returns, Gurri also has the upper hand with 35.79% over Wild's 25.12%.
• Under pressure, Wild has been more effective at saving breakpoints, achieving a 58.17% save rate, whereas Gurri stands at 51.72%. Does this indicate resilience under pressure? Possibly.
• Looking at overall match wins in the past year, Gurri boasts a 64.63% win rate contrasted with Wild's 43.64%, revealing Gurri's superior consistency.
• Both players have their strongest performances on clay surfaces, with Gurri slightly ahead with a 62% win rate over Wild's 58%.
• While Wild competes more frequently on the Main tour with a 57.89% win rate, Gurri has excelled in lower-tier events, winning 69.39%. How much does the quality of opponents factor in here? Considerably, as Wild faces tougher opponents with an average rank of 166.76 versus Gurri's 426.63.
• In deciding sets, Gurri shows superior performance, winning 60% compared to Wild's 50%, a potentially decisive factor if the match extends.
• For break point conversions, Gurri again leads with a conversion rate of 41.28%, while Wild’s is at 29.13%, indicating Gurri's efficiency in critical moments.

Editorial Prediction (July 1, 2025, UTC):

In analyzing the upcoming match between Wild and Gurri, the statistics present an intriguing contrast in styles and capabilities.

Wild displays a slight edge in second serve performance and resilience under pressure with his breakpoint saving ability. This indicates that in tight situations, Wild may be able to hang tough and fend off challenges effectively.

Gurri's advantage in return games, especially first serve returns, and his history of converting breakpoints efficiently, suggests a player who capitalizes well on opponents’ weaknesses.

While Wild plays at a higher tour level, facing tougher opponents, Gurri's superior win rate and stronger performance in deciding sets suggest a player in good form capable of closing matches.

Taking into consideration the overall stats and current form, the data indicates Gurri as the most likely winner, exploiting any lapses in Wild’s service games and holding his ground under pressure.